Account of near-cathode sheath in numerical models of high-pressure arc discharges (bibtex)
by M S Benilov, N A Almeida, M Baeva, M D Cunha, L G Benilova and D Uhrlandt
Abstract:
Three approaches to describing the separation of charges in near-cathode regions of high-pressure arc discharges are compared. The first approach employs a single set of equations, including the Poisson equation, in the whole interelectrode gap. The second approach employs a fully non-equilibrium description of the quasi-neutral bulk plasma, complemented with a newly developed description of the space-charge sheaths. The third, and the simplest, approach exploits the fact that significant power is deposited by the arc power supply into the near-cathode plasma layer, which allows one to simulate the plasma–cathode interaction to the first approximation independently of processes in the bulk plasma. It is found that results given by the different models are generally in good agreement, and in some cases the agreement is even surprisingly good. It follows that the predicted integral characteristics of the plasma–cathode interaction are not strongly affected by details of the model provided that the basic physics is right.
Reference:
M S Benilov, N A Almeida, M Baeva, M D Cunha, L G Benilova and D Uhrlandt, "Account of near-cathode sheath in numerical models of high-pressure arc discharges", J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 49, no. 21, pp. 215201, 2016.
Bibtex Entry:
@ARTICLE{2016d,
  author = {M S Benilov and N A Almeida and M Baeva and M D Cunha and L G Benilova
	and D Uhrlandt},
  title = {Account of near-cathode sheath in numerical models of high-pressure
	arc discharges},
  journal = {J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.},
  year = {2016},
  volume = {49},
  pages = {215201},
  number = {21},
  abstract = {Three approaches to describing the separation of charges in near-cathode
	regions of high-pressure arc discharges are compared. The first approach
	employs a single set of equations, including the Poisson equation,
	in the whole interelectrode gap. The second approach employs a fully
	non-equilibrium description of the quasi-neutral bulk plasma, complemented
	with a newly developed description of the space-charge sheaths. The
	third, and the simplest, approach exploits the fact that significant
	power is deposited by the arc power supply into the near-cathode
	plasma layer, which allows one to simulate the plasma–cathode interaction
	to the first approximation independently of processes in the bulk
	plasma. It is found that results given by the different models are
	generally in good agreement, and in some cases the agreement is even
	surprisingly good. It follows that the predicted integral characteristics
	of the plasma–cathode interaction are not strongly affected by details
	of the model provided that the basic physics is right.},
  file = {2016d.pdf:2016d.pdf:PDF},
  url = {http://stacks.iop.org/0022-3727/49/i=21/a=215201}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser